The Best Online-Only Publications According to Socialists

We’ve got 108 responses to our survey of online-only left-wing publications, and the results are intriguing!

This is the 2nd of a series of surveys by LeftTimes to help improve our news feed; the 3rd will cover left podcasts and the 1st covered left magazines. But stay tuned for an update! The left-magazine survey has another 200+ respondents since our blog post and the results have changed quite a bit!

Thank you to all our respondents. We hope you are having fun!

First, a few qualifiers:

Please note this survey is not random. It was distributed to our target audience, and respondents were self selecting. 78% identified as socialist and 76% identified as Marxist (with about 80% overlap between the two).
This survey included 66 online-only publications. It did not include online publications with print magazines as those were covered in our previous left-magazine survey.
19 of the publications in this survey didn’t receive more than 15 ratings so we aren’t including them in the results. We are leaving all the surveys open so we can publish updates later.
Even with that 15-rating cutoff, interpreting the results is tricky due to some publications getting more ratings than others. In general, the less known a publication is, the more overly-positive the average rating appears to be.

Who’s “winning”? – Labor Notes & The Intercept

There were 6 publications that clearly were a cut above the rest, ranging from 4.2 to 3.8 stars on average. In order, they were:

This is a similar ballpark that our top 10 from the magazine survey came in. Rounding out the top 10 in the 3.6-3.7 star rating range, we have:

Other Noteworthy Performers

Coming in around 3.35 to 3.55 stars:

Who’s “losing”? – Daily Kos

The 8 lowest-rated publications, ending with the lowest, were:

These ranged from 1.6 stars to 2.2 stars, which is particularly low given that the lowest in the magazine survey range from 2.1 to 2.5 stars (they’ve dropped half a star since we published that post… more about this in the next update).

Daily Kos received a scathing 1.62 stars from 79 respondents. This can be interpreted in two ways: both in terms of the low quality of work produced by DailyKos, as well as, socialists not taking kindly to the positions Daily Kos took on the 2016 primaries.

Anarchist Anomalies

In the first blog post, we discussed the Marxism divide among socialists and the variance in ratings that appeared to be producing. Here, we noticed some interesting patterns with people who self-identified as anarchists.

Overall, anarchists rated a publications much lower than everybody else. There were only two publications where anarchists rated them higher than others, and those were the two anarchist publications: It’s Going Down and CrimethInc. The noteworthy differences:

Publication	Anarchist Rating	Non-Anarchist Rating
It’s Going Down	4.08	3.49
CrimethInc	3.48	2.94
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting	3.75	4.11
People’s Policy Project	3.73	4.19
Atlas Obscura	3.33	3.94
Aeon	3.33	3.81
Real News Network	3.24	3.59
Economic Policy Institute	3.08	3.76
Outline	2.92	3.43
Truthdig	2.62	3.12
Institute for New Economic Thinking	2.73	3.46

Ideologies and their Identity Politics

Anarchists in this survey really made a statement in this survey with 89% identifying as anti-racist.

This surprised us so much that we went back to our first survey to see what happened there (especially with all the new responses we received). It turns out that anarchists (and progressives!) have been a bit more likely to identify as anti-racist:

Ideological affiliation	% also picked anti-racism
Anarchism	76%
Progressivism	76%
Communism	70%
Marxism	67%
Liberalism	65%
Socialism	65%

And while ideological affiliations that have to do with racial, gender, and sexual identities show more solidarity for each other, notice the disparity in reciprocity.

Ideological affiliation	% also picked anti-racism	% also picked feminism	% also picked pro-LGBTQ+
Anti-racism		59%	65%
Feminism	84%		71%
Pro-LGBTQ+	83%	69%

For context, of all survey respondents, 61% identified as anti-racist, 46% as feminist, 47% as pro-LGBTQ+. Be careful reading into this though, because the ideological affiliations were listed alphabetically and anti-racism appeared 3rd.

Next up: Podcasts

If you enjoyed this blog post, then please take our next survey on left podcasts, or, add your voice to the left magazine and online-only publication surveys. We’ll be publishing updates to all of these surveys.

We have already updated the LeftTimes algorithms as well, adding several new publications as a result of this survey. But don’t worry: we won’t let these dictate everything, but we want to know what our readers are thinking!

And if you haven’t yet checked us out, bookmark LeftTimes, or download our iOS or Android app.

Special thanks to William Dawley for helping with this survey and analysis.

The Best Political Magazines – According to Socialists

The results are in! We at LeftTimes ran a survey to improve our article recommendations, asking people to rate 65 left-of-center magazines.

We’ve got 94 responses so far and the results are quite fascinating!

First, a few qualifiers

This survey was distributed to some of our target audience, so you might call the respondents to this poll a self-selecting “judgment sample.” LeftTimes focuses on providing left-of-center readers (not liberals or conservatives) with high-quality journalism. As a result, 75% of our respondents identified as socialist.
We only included print magazines in the survey (no digital-only magazines). You can take our next survey on online-only left publications here.
25 of the 65 magazines have gotten less than 15 ratings, so we aren’t (yet) including them in the summative results. We’re continuing to collect responses and will publish updates later.
We allowed people to identify with as many different political ideologies and interests as they wished.

Who is “winning”? – Viewpoint Magazine

Viewpoint Magazine is the standout winner with an average rating of 4.6 stars!

The rest of the 10 all fall between 4 – 3.8 stars. In order, the top 10 are:

The next best magazines all got less than 3.7 stars and thus are a bit behind this top tier group, at least on average (since our respondents seemed to disagree on many sources). A special mention goes out to Pacific Standard and Salvage, both of which are just shy of having 15 ratings and appear almost certain to make it into this top tier.

So if you know your political magazines, please take the survey! It’ll only take 3 minutes. With a bit more data we might be able to solidify these rankings. And feel free to share it with your groups (and tag us) to let us see what others think.

What surprised us most? – Baffler and Dissent

Baffler and Dissent only got an average of 3.6 and 3.5 stars, respectively. Now these are still quite respectable ratings, putting these mags at the top of the main pack along with the LA Review of Books, The Nation, New Inquiry, Catalyst, Z Magazine, and The Progressive. However, we were expecting them to make it into the top-tier category, and perhaps the top of it. Clearly, on average, the crowd we’ve reached so far disagrees with us.

Who is “losing”? – Ms. Magazine

The 10 lowest rated magazines (2.5 to 3 stars), ending with the lowest, were:

Note again that there isn’t uniform agreement with these bottom ten, or on most of the magazines. Both liberals and libertarians rate The Atlantic, Mother Jones, New Statesman, New York Magazine, Ms. Magazine and New Republic much higher than socialists.

The Best Bellwether: Atlantic Magazine

People’s opinion on The Atlantic appears to be the most predictive of their political affiliations and their ratings of other magazines.

Those that rated the Atlantic favorably were significantly more likely to identify with progressivism, liberalism, or the religious left. Meanwhile, those that rated the Atlantic unfavorably were significantly more likely to identify with Marxism, communism, anarchism or anti-imperialism.

Ratings of the Atlantic appear to be strongly correlated with ratings of the New Yorker, New Republic, Mother Jones, New York Magazine, and Ms. Magazine, and weakly correlated with ratings of Harper’s Magazine, The Nation, New Statesman, and Vice.

On the other hand, how respondents rated Atlantic appears to be strongly inversely correlated with ratings of Z Magazine, ROAR and New Left Review. However, this inverse correlation seemed weaker between ratings of the Atlantic and ratings of other left-wing magazines.

The Socialist Divide: Marxism

For socialists, affiliating with Marxism appears to be a significant dividing line. In the survey, 97% of Marxists identified as socialists; however, only 60% of socialists identified as Marxists.

These two groups were only able to agree on the quality of a handful of magazines, including Viewpoint, Baffler, In These Times, London Review of Books, Dissent, and Z Magazine. And while both groups were relatively down on the Atlantic and magazines like it, Marxists gave much lower ratings than non-Marxist socialists on average. Other major/interesting disagreements between these groups included:

Rating comparison
Magazine	Marxist Socialists	Non-Marxist Socialists
Salvage	4.6 stars	3.0 stars
New Left Review	4.0 stars	3.6 stars
New Inquiry	3.9 stars	2.7 stars
International Socialist Review	3.3 stars	2.7 stars
Counterpunch	3.3 stars	2.6 stars
Catalyst	3.9 stars	3.7 stars
Jacobin	3.8 stars	4.3 stars
Current Affairs	3.9 stars	4.2 stars
The Nation	3.2 stars	4.1 stars

Note how even though Jacobin and Catalyst are affiliated magazines, non-Marxist socialists really love Jacobin, while Marxist socialists just think it is solid and actually slightly prefer Catalyst.

Next up: Survey on Online-Only Left Publications

If you enjoyed this blog post, then please take our next survey on online-only left publications.

We’ll publish the results again, and of course this will help us make LeftTimes even better! We have already updated the LeftTimes algorithms as well, adding several new publications as a result of this survey. But don’t worry: we won’t let these dictate everything, but we want to know what our readers are thinking!

And if you haven’t yet checked us out, bookmark LeftTimes, or download our iOS or Android app.

Special thanks to William Dawley for helping with this survey and analysis.

Americans are Already Socialists at Heart – Just Look at Pro-Sports

The pundits say that Bernie Sanders has no chance to win and that no socialist could ever be more than a fringe candidate. I say: not so fast! Americans are already socialists at heart.

It’s true. Professional football, basketball and hockey leagues have salary caps, a draft system, semi-permanent league memberships, and among other things, even$435,000 minimum wages in the NFL. Think about that. What other industries in America have this level of socialism built in? Our entire public education system pays for the training of every generation of athletes. Once in college, athletes don’t get paid, and the profits from their labor (in the sports entertainment industry) go towards funding public education. How much more socialist can we get?

Compare this to European soccer where instead of getting the 1st draft pick, the losing teams get knocked out of the league. There is no draft system that fairly distributes the players across the teams. There is no public education system that pays to train athletes for professional teams. No, in Europe, the soccer teams fund their own youth training programs, signing athletes at ages as young as seven. There are no salary caps or minimum wages. The highest bidder simply wins (which can be as high as $100 million), and as a result, there are basically 10 teams out of hundreds in Europe that win everything every year.

Permanent dynasties are exactly what American sports leagues are trying to prevent. They are trying to create a level playing field and give everyone a chance to win: and that’s exactly what socialism is all about. See, Americans already are socialists at heart.

American sports are basically a glitch in the matrix that reveal the lie in the narrative that conservatives are “pro-capitalism” and liberals are “pro-big government.” Consider that it is permanent league memberships that enable NFL, NBA, NHL, MLS and MLB franchises to force their local governments to give them huge tax breaks andpay hundreds of millions of dollars for their stadiums. Not to mention, most of these franchises have their income guaranteed for eternity because no new franchises can ever oust/replace them. Socialists aren’t always opposed to capitalist solutions, and in this instance, socialists are more capitalist than American conservatives.

We see something similar in college sports where socialists would rather treat student athletes as employees and compensate them with salaries and benefits. Socialists are fine with funding public universities with the profits from professional sports teams, but even if we are going to do this, we still have to take care of the 98 percent of athletes that don’t ultimately go pro. They need to get paid and/or be guaranteed a college education when their athletic career is over. Socialists are fine with compensating athletes with an education, but it can’t be a pretend education they get while playing a sport full time.

Of course, most Americans oppose these reforms to American sports. To this, leftist liberals need simply respond that American sports fans are bigger socialists than they are #feelthebern. So next time someone reacts to Bernie by saying socialists are evil, talk about sports.

Like this:

Like this:

Like this: